The Rwandan Genocide
A Belgian census card from 1933 told the killers which neighbors to kill
Open
The word used at the time, in newsrooms and in foreign ministries, was tribal. Ancient hatreds. Something that had welled up and would burn itself out.
Here is what the record shows. Roadblocks were up across the capital within one hour of the plane coming down. The lists of who to kill had been typed in advance. The peacekeepers from one particular country were murdered first, because the planners had calculated that their government would then leave, and they were right.
And the document a militiaman at a roadblock asked you for, the one that decided whether you lived, had been designed by a Belgian colonial administration in the nineteen thirties.
Scene 1One hour
The evening of the sixth of April, nineteen ninety four. A Falcon 50 carrying the presidents of Rwanda and Burundi comes in to land at Kigali.
A surface to air missile takes it down. Everyone aboard is killed. Who fired it has never been settled, and both answers serve somebody.
Within the hour, roadblocks manned by the Interahamwe militia and the presidential guard are up across the city.
They have lists. Tutsi politicians, moderate Hutu officials, journalists, human rights workers, by name and address.
A killing that begins one hour after the trigger event is not a reaction to it.
Scene 2The prime minister
Agathe Uwilingiyimana was the prime minister. She was a moderate Hutu, and she was near the top of the list.
On the morning of the seventh she telephoned the headquarters of the United Nations mission.
Scene 3A hundred days
The instrument was the machete, the club and the small arm, which is why the pace is so hard to take in.
A radio station broadcast the encouragement and a good deal of the targeting. Announcers called Tutsis cockroaches and snakes, and read names and addresses on air.
The organisation was administrative. Killing squads were raised at commune level by the local officials who ran everything else, and officials who refused to take part were killed themselves.
You can see that in one province. Butare was the one prefecture with a Tutsi prefect, and the killing there started ten days later than everywhere else. It started when the government removed him and sent militia down from the capital.
People went where people go. Ten thousand sheltered in the Catholic church at Nyamata, and were killed there with machetes and grenades over two days.
At a technical school at Murambi, local officials told fifty thousand Tutsis they would be protected if they gathered there. On the twenty first of April, soldiers and militia killed about forty thousand of them in one night.
Five accounts
Five accounts of a hundred days.
vanquishedTutsi Survivors
The survivors
The first belongs to the people it was done to, and its first insistence is on the word neighbour.
This was not carried out by strangers who arrived. It was carried out at close range by people who knew the names of the children they were killing, in the parish, at the school, on the road between two houses.
Between two hundred and fifty and five hundred thousand women and girls were raped, as a method, deliberately. The tribunal that followed recognised something no court had recognised before, that rape had been used here as an instrument of genocide, and convicted on that basis.
The survivors were then left with the consequence. Health agencies later estimated that seven in ten of them were living with HIV.
And they were left living in the same villages, because there was nowhere else, often within sight of the families of the people who had done it.
Read the full account
Narrative
Immaculee Ilibagiza was 22 years old on April 7, 1994. She spent 91 days hidden in a bathroom 3 feet by 4 feet with seven other women, concealed behind a wardrobe in the home of a Hutu pastor. Through the bathroom wall, she heard Interahamwe searching the house. She lost 40 pounds. When she emerged, her family (mother, father, and two brothers) were dead. Her account, Left to Tell (2006), has been translated into 17 languages and is assigned in genocide studies courses worldwide.
Survivor accounts converge on specific patterns. The killing was methodical, not chaotic. Interahamwe manned roadblocks where national identity cards, which listed ethnic identity, a Belgian colonial innovation maintained by the Habyarimana government, served as death warrants. Tutsis whose cards read "Tutsi" were killed on the spot. Those who had obtained fraudulent "Hutu" cards were sometimes identified by physical features or denounced by neighbors. At the barriers, militia members checked hands for calluses (farmers vs. herders), measured noses, and assessed height: colonial-era racial categories weaponized into sorting mechanisms.
Survivors describe the betrayal by institutions. Churches, schools, and government buildings where Tutsis gathered for protection became killing sites. At Ntarama Church, 5,000 people sought refuge; the militia attacked with machetes and grenades on April 15. The church was left standing, its walls marked with machete strikes and grenade fragments. It is now a memorial. At Nyange parish, a Hutu priest named Athanase Seromba ordered his church bulldozed with 2,000 Tutsis inside. He was convicted by the ICTR in 2006 and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Sexual violence was systematic. Human Rights Watch documented that rape was used as a deliberate instrument of genocide, ordered by military commanders, carried out by militia, and intended to destroy the Tutsi community through humiliation, infection (many rapists were knowingly HIV-positive), and forced pregnancy. The ICTR's Akayesu decision (September 1998) was the first in international law to recognize rape as a component of genocide. Jean-Paul Akayesu, the bourgmestre of Taba commune, was convicted for ordering and encouraging the rape of Tutsi women. The tribunal defined rape as "a physical invasion of a sexual nature, committed on a person under circumstances which are coercive."
The aftermath for survivors was compounded by the sheer density of loss. In a country of 7 million, an estimated 300,000 children were orphaned. Many survivors returned to find their homes occupied by neighbors who had participated in the killing. The Gacaca courts (2005-2012) required survivors to face perpetrators in community tribunals (in some cases, the very people who had killed their families). Survivors testifying in Gacaca described re-traumatization but also, in some cases, a form of resolution. Perpetrators who confessed fully received reduced sentences; some were required to perform community service rebuilding the homes they had destroyed.
The survivor community, organized through Ibuka ("Remember"), the main survivors' association, has pushed for memorialization and education. Rwanda now observes Kwibuka (remembrance) every April, with a national week of mourning. The Kigali Genocide Memorial, which holds the remains of over 250,000 victims, opens each year's commemorations. Survivor testimony is integrated into the national curriculum. The tension between remembrance and reconciliation, between the obligation to name what happened and the governmental policy of suppressing ethnic categories, defines post-genocide Rwanda's internal contradiction.
Arguments
- The genocide was pre-planned, systematic, and executed through state institutions
- Ethnic identity cards (a colonial-era instrument) served as sorting mechanisms for killing
- Sexual violence was ordered and systematic, not incidental
- Survivors faced perpetrators in Gacaca courts, justice layered with re-traumatization
Sources
- Left to Tell: Discovering God Amidst the Rwandan Holocaust
- Shattered Lives: Sexual Violence during the Rwandan Genocide
- Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu (Judgment)
bystanderUN Peacekeeping / International Failure
The peacekeepers
The second account is the mission on the ground, and it turns on a single fax.
On the eleventh of January, three months before any of this, the force commander, Romeo Dallaire, cabled New York. An informant inside the militia had told him three things. Weapons were being cached across the capital for distribution. Belgian peacekeepers would be attacked in order to force a withdrawal. And lists of every Tutsi in Kigali had been drawn up, in the informant's words, for their extermination.
The informant offered to show him the weapons. Dallaire asked permission to raid them.
The reply came the same day. The raid exceeded his mandate. He was told instead to pass the intelligence to the president of Rwanda, whose own circle was organising it.
Everything in that fax then happened, in order.
Read the full account
Narrative
On January 11, 1994, General Romeo Dallaire sent a cable from Kigali to the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations in New York. The cable (cataloged as DPKO/UNAMIR outgoing code cable 11 January 1994, later known as the "genocide fax") reported intelligence from a high-level informant within the Interahamwe militia. The informant, identified by the codename "Jean-Pierre," disclosed three facts: weapons were being cached across Kigali for distribution to Interahamwe cells; Belgian peacekeepers would be targeted in order to trigger a Belgian withdrawal; and lists of all Tutsis in Kigali had been compiled, "for their extermination." Jean-Pierre offered to show Dallaire the weapons caches. Dallaire requested authorization to raid them. Kofi Annan's office replied within hours: the proposed action exceeded UNAMIR's Chapter VI mandate. Dallaire was instructed to share the intelligence with President Habyarimana, the head of the government whose associates were planning the genocide.
Three months later, the genocide began. On April 7, 1994, ten Belgian peacekeepers assigned to protect Prime Minister Agathe Uwilingiyimana were captured, disarmed by Rwandan government soldiers at Camp Kigali, tortured, and killed. Belgium withdrew its contingent (its 400 troops were the best-equipped in UNAMIR) within a week. The sequence matched the informant's prediction precisely. The UN Security Council convened on April 21. The United States, led by Ambassador Madeleine Albright, pushed for full withdrawal. The compromise was worse: reduction from 2,548 to 270 troops. Dallaire defied the order and retained approximately 450 by refusing to release some contingents.
The United States' role was not passive neglect. It was active obstruction. Declassified documents from the National Security Archive show that the Defense Intelligence Agency identified the killings as genocide by April 11. The State Department's legal advisor instructed spokespeople to say "acts of genocide may have occurred", a formulation designed to avoid triggering the Genocide Convention's obligation to prevent and punish. On June 10, State Department spokesperson Christine Shelley was asked how many "acts of genocide" constitute "genocide." She replied: "That's just not a question that I'm in a position to answer." The exchange became a case study in bureaucratic moral evasion.
The Clinton administration's internal calculus was shaped by Somalia. Eighteen American soldiers had been killed in Mogadishu on October 3, 1993, six months before the Rwandan genocide began. Presidential Decision Directive 25, signed in May 1994 while the genocide was underway, established restrictive criteria for U.S. support of peacekeeping operations. Rwanda was the first test of the new doctrine. The United States did not merely fail to act. It actively worked to prevent others from acting, blocking a Security Council resolution that would have authorized reinforcement, and refusing to jam RTLM radio broadcasts that were directing the killers to their victims.
France's Operation Turquoise, authorized by the Security Council on June 22, deployed 2,500 French troops to southwestern Rwanda under a humanitarian mandate. The operation saved Tutsi lives at Bisesero, where survivors had held out for weeks on a hilltop under sustained attack. But the "safe zone" also provided a corridor for genocidaires to escape into Zaire. At Goma, across the border, 850,000 Hutu refugees arrived in July, among them thousands of armed Interahamwe and former Rwandan army soldiers who used the camps as bases for cross-border raids, destabilizing the region for three decades.
The UN's own Independent Inquiry, the Carlsson Report (1999), concluded that the organization had failed at every level: headquarters in New York, the Security Council, and the member states whose interests determined the Council's inaction. Kofi Annan, by then Secretary-General, accepted the report and said: "The international community failed Rwanda." Dallaire, who suffered severe PTSD and attempted suicide in 2000, wrote: "I know there is a God, because in Rwanda I shook hands with the devil."
Arguments
- The genocide fax of January 11 provided specific, actionable intelligence that the UN headquarters refused to act on
- The US deliberately avoided the word "genocide" to circumvent the Genocide Convention's legal obligation to intervene
- The Security Council reduced UNAMIR from 2,548 to 270 troops after the genocide had begun (active disengagement, not passive neglect)
- France's Operation Turquoise saved some lives but provided an escape corridor for genocidaires into Zaire
Sources
- Shake Hands with the Devil: The Failure of Humanity in Rwanda
- A People Betrayed: The Role of the West in Rwanda's Genocide
- Bystanders to Genocide: Why the United States Let the Rwandan Tragedy Happen
- Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Actions of the United Nations during the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda (Carlsson Report)
bystanderInternational Community / United Nations
The United Nations
The third account is the political one, in New York and in Washington, and it is mostly about a word.
The Genocide Convention obliges the states that signed it to act. So the question of whether to use the word was not a semantic one. It was a legal trigger, and everybody in the room knew it.
So for weeks the language was acts of genocide, or tribal violence, or civil war. One American spokeswoman was asked directly how many acts of genocide it takes to make a genocide, and had no answer.
Meanwhile the Council had a mission on the ground that it chose to shrink, in the third week, with the killing at its height.
Read the full account
Narrative
The United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) was established in October 1993 to monitor the Arusha Accords, a power-sharing agreement between the Habyarimana government and the RPF. Force Commander Romeo Dallaire, a Canadian lieutenant-general, arrived in Kigali with a mandate limited to Chapter VI peacekeeping: monitoring, not enforcement. His authorized strength was 2,548 troops. He received approximately 2,100.
On January 11, 1994, Dallaire sent a cable to UN headquarters, the "genocide fax", reporting that an informant within the Interahamwe had revealed weapons caches, plans to kill Belgian peacekeepers (to trigger a withdrawal), and registration lists of all Tutsis in Kigali. The informant, codenamed "Jean-Pierre," offered to show Dallaire the weapons depots. Dallaire requested permission to raid them. Kofi Annan's office in the Department of Peacekeeping Operations replied the same day: the proposed action exceeded UNAMIR's mandate. Dallaire was instructed to share the intelligence with President Habyarimana instead, the head of the very government whose associates were planning the genocide.
When the killing began on April 7, Dallaire's troops were outgunned and outnumbered. Belgian peacekeepers at Camp Kigali were surrendered by their Ghanaian counterparts under threat and murdered. Belgium withdrew its 400 troops (the best-equipped contingent) within a week. The UN Security Council debated the situation on April 21; the United States, led by Ambassador Madeleine Albright, pushed for a complete withdrawal. The compromise was reduction to 270, essentially an observer mission. Dallaire kept approximately 450 troops by refusing to release some contingents.
The U.S. government's internal deliberations, declassified in subsequent years, showed that officials at the State Department, the Pentagon, and the NSC were aware of the killings' scale by mid-April. A Defense Intelligence Agency report from April 11 described the situation as "genocide." The State Department's legal advisor instructed spokespersons to say "acts of genocide may have occurred", phrasing designed to avoid the legal trigger of the Genocide Convention. When pressed at a State Department briefing on June 10, spokesperson Christine Shelley engaged in a now-infamous exchange: asked how many "acts of genocide" constitute "genocide," she replied, "That's just not a question that I'm in a position to answer."
France maintained a complex relationship with the Habyarimana regime. French military advisors had trained the Rwandan army and Gendarmerie since 1990; France supplied weapons, including after the Arusha Accords imposed an arms embargo. Operation Turquoise, launched June 23 with 2,500 French troops, established a "humanitarian safe zone" in the southwest. The operation saved Tutsi lives in some areas (including at Bisesero, where Tutsi resisters held out for weeks before French forces arrived) but also provided cover for genocidaires fleeing into Zaire. At Goma, across the border, 850,000 Hutu refugees arrived in July, among them thousands of Interahamwe and former Rwandan army soldiers who used the refugee camps as bases.
The UN's own Independent Inquiry (the Carlsson Report, 1999) concluded: "The overriding failure was the lack of resources and political will of member states." Annan, by then Secretary-General, accepted the report and stated: "The international community failed Rwanda." Dallaire, who suffered severe PTSD and attempted suicide in 2000, wrote in Shake Hands with the Devil: "The world moved on, but I could not."
Arguments
- UNAMIR's Chapter VI mandate prevented preventive action even with advance intelligence
- The 'genocide fax' of January 11 was ignored by UN headquarters in New York
- The U.S. deliberately avoided the word 'genocide' to circumvent the Convention's obligation to act
- France's military relationship with the Habyarimana regime compromised its intervention
Sources
- Shake Hands with the Devil: The Failure of Humanity in Rwanda
- A People Betrayed: The Role of the West in Rwanda's Genocide
- Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Actions of the United Nations during the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda
revisionistPan-African / Postcolonial
The pan-African reading
The fourth account says the clock started a century earlier.
Hutu and Tutsi existed before any European arrived. They were not what they became. They were fluid social categories, tied to cattle and to closeness to the royal court, and people moved between them.
What the Belgian administration did in the nineteen thirties was fix them. Every Rwandan was measured, classified and issued a card. Hutu, about eighty five in a hundred. Tutsi, fourteen. Twa, one. If you owned ten cows or more, you were Tutsi.
The classification was hereditary and could not be changed, and it was built on a racial theory imported from Europe which held that the sophistication of East African kingdoms must have come from somewhere further north.
Tutsis got the schools, the administrative posts and the church hierarchy. Hutus got the labour. Then, at independence, the colonial power changed sides and handed power to the majority it had spent forty years subordinating.
Nineteen ninety four was carried out with Rwandan hands. The instrument in the hand at the roadblock was printed in Brussels.
Read the full account
Narrative
The Rwandan genocide did not begin on April 6, 1994. It began in 1894, when Germany's Count Gustav Adolf von Gotzen became the first European to reach the Rwandan royal court, and it accelerated in 1916, when Belgium assumed control under a League of Nations mandate. The Belgians did not invent the categories of Hutu and Tutsi; these identities existed in precolonial Rwanda as fluid social designations related to cattle ownership and proximity to the royal court. But the Belgians fixed them. In the 1930s, the colonial administration introduced identity cards classifying every Rwandan as Hutu (approximately 85%), Tutsi (14%), or Twa (1%) based on physical measurements and cattle ownership. A person with ten or more cows was classified as Tutsi. The categories were hereditary, immutable, and enforced.
The Belgian colonial system elevated Tutsis as a ruling class, an application of the Hamitic hypothesis, a racial theory that attributed the political sophistication of East African kingdoms to "Caucasoid" migration from the north. Tutsis were granted access to education, administrative posts, and the Catholic Church hierarchy. Hutus were confined to manual labor. When independence movements gained force in the late 1950s, Belgium reversed its allegiance, supporting the Hutu majority in the 1959 Social Revolution that overthrew the Tutsi monarchy. Approximately 20,000 Tutsis were killed and 150,000 fled into exile, the first of several waves that created the diaspora from which the RPF later emerged.
Mahmood Mamdani's When Victims Become Killers: Colonialism, Nativism, and the Genocide in Rwanda (2001) argues that the genocide must be understood as a product of colonial political identity, not ancient tribal hatred. The categories that determined who lived and who died at the roadblocks of 1994 were inscribed on cards designed in Brussels. The racial ideology broadcast by RTLM drew directly on the Hamitic hypothesis: Tutsis as foreign invaders, Hutus as the authentic Rwandan people. The "Hutu Ten Commandments," published in Kangura magazine in December 1990, warned against Tutsi "infiltration" using language borrowed from European racial science.
The Pan-African critique extends to the international response. The contrast between the speed of Western intervention in Bosnia (NATO airstrikes, 1994-95) and the abandonment of Rwanda is, in this reading, a function of racial calculus. Wole Soyinka, the Nigerian Nobel laureate, wrote in 1999: "The life of an African is worth less in the corridors of international power than the life of a European. Rwanda proved it." The Organization of African Unity's own report (2000), authored by a panel including former Malian president Amadou Toumani Toure, described the genocide as "the international community's shame" and called for a new African security architecture.
France's role draws particular scrutiny. President Francois Mitterrand's government maintained a military alliance with Habyarimana throughout the civil war (1990-1993), supplying weapons, training, and direct military support against the RPF. French soldiers manned checkpoints during Operation Noroit (1990-1993). The Duclert Commission report, released in March 2021 after a two-year investigation commissioned by President Emmanuel Macron, concluded that France bore "heavy and overwhelming responsibilities" in the genocide, though it stopped short of finding complicity. The commission documented French arms deliveries that continued after the genocide began, the passage of genocidaires through French-controlled zones during Operation Turquoise, and Mitterrand's private remark that "in those countries, a genocide isn't too important."
The postcolonial perspective insists that the genocide cannot be explained as an African aberration, a descent into "tribal savagery," as Western media framed it in 1994. It was a modern event, organized through a state bureaucracy built by Europeans, using identity categories created by Europeans, executed with weapons supplied by Europeans, and tolerated by a Western-led international system that did not value African lives enough to intervene. The genocide was not a failure of Africa. It was a failure of the world, and that failure had a colonial architecture.
Arguments
- Belgian colonial administration created the fixed ethnic categories used to sort victims
- The Hamitic hypothesis (a European racial theory) provided the ideological framework for genocide
- Western non-intervention reflected a racial calculus that devalued African lives
- France maintained military alliance with the genocidal regime before and during the killing
Sources
- When Victims Become Killers: Colonialism, Nativism, and the Genocide in Rwanda
- Rwanda and Genocide in the Twentieth Century
- La France, le Rwanda et le genocide des Tutsi (1990-1994), Duclert Commission Report
- Rwanda: The Preventable Genocide (OAU Panel Report)
academicPost-Genocide Rwanda / Academic
Rwanda after
The fifth account is about what was built on the ruins, and it does not resolve.
The courts first. No conventional legal system could try a million cases, so Rwanda adapted a traditional village hearing. About twelve thousand community courts processed one point nine six million cases in seven years. It is the largest exercise in transitional justice ever attempted, and it was conducted in public, by neighbours, about neighbours.
Then the state. Growth averaged seven and a half per cent a year for nearly two decades. Foreign aid fell from eighty six per cent of the national budget to forty. Kigali became a showcase. Rwanda has among the highest proportions of women in parliament anywhere in the world.
And the same government permits no real opposition, jails and silences journalists, and has been credibly linked to the killing of critics who fled abroad.
Scholars call it the Rwandan paradox. A country that will not have another nineteen ninety four, governed in a way that does not allow anyone to test that claim.
Read the full account
Narrative
Rwanda's post-genocide trajectory under Paul Kagame and the RPF has produced what scholars call the "Rwandan paradox": a country with one of Africa's fastest-growing economies, lowest corruption indices, and highest female parliamentary representation, governed by an authoritarian regime that tolerates no political opposition, suppresses press freedom, and has been implicated in assassinations of dissidents abroad.
The economic transformation is documented in GDP growth averaging 7.5% annually between 2001 and 2019. Kigali, rebuilt from the rubble of 1994, became a showcase capital: clean streets (plastic bags were banned in 2008), a convention center, a $300 million airport expansion. Rwanda ranks 38th on the World Bank's Ease of Doing Business index, the second-highest in Africa. Vision 2050 targets upper-middle-income status. Foreign aid, which accounted for 86% of the budget in 2000, dropped to 40% by 2019.
The Gacaca court system (inkiko gacaca) drew on traditional dispute resolution mechanisms, adapted to handle genocide cases at a scale no conventional court system could manage. Between 2005 and 2012, approximately 12,000 community-based courts heard 1.96 million cases. Defendants were categorized: Category 1 (planners, leaders, sexual violence) went to conventional courts; Categories 2 and 3 (killers and property offenders) went to Gacaca. Full confession earned reduced sentences and community service. Phil Clark's The Gacaca Courts, Post-Genocide Justice and Reconciliation in Rwanda (2010) documented both the system's therapeutic potential (survivors hearing confessions, communities processing collective guilt) and its distortions: coerced confessions, false accusations used to settle land disputes, and the exclusion of RPF crimes from Gacaca jurisdiction.
The RPF's own conduct divides scholars who otherwise agree on the genocide's basic facts. The Gersony Report, a UNHCR investigation conducted by Robert Gersony in September 1994, documented systematic killings by RPF soldiers of Hutu civilians in the months after the genocide, estimating 25,000-45,000 deaths. The UN suppressed the report under pressure from the new Rwandan government. Filip Reyntjens, a Belgian political scientist and former adviser to the Rwandan government, broke with the regime over this issue, arguing in Political Governance in Post-Genocide Rwanda (2013) that the RPF has constructed an "authoritarian reconciliation" that criminalizes dissent as divisionism.
The 2003 Constitution abolished ethnic categories. National identity cards no longer list Hutu, Tutsi, or Twa. The "genocide ideology" law, passed in 2008 and revised in 2013, criminalizes speech that could promote ethnic division, but critics, including Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, document its use against opposition politicians, journalists, and academics who question the RPF narrative. Victoire Ingabire, a Hutu opposition leader who returned from exile in 2010 to run for president, was arrested, charged with genocide ideology and collaboration with a terrorist organization, and sentenced to 15 years (later reduced to 8 on appeal).
The regional dimension compounds the picture. Following the genocide, approximately 2 million Hutu refugees, including tens of thousands of armed genocidaires, fled into eastern Zaire. Their presence destabilized the region, contributing to the fall of Mobutu Sese Seko (1997), the First Congo War (1996-97), and the Second Congo War (1998-2003), which killed an estimated 5.4 million people and has been called "Africa's World War." Rwanda's military interventions in the DRC, including support for M23 rebels documented by UN Group of Experts reports in 2012 and 2022, are defended by Kigali as security operations against genocidaire remnants and criticized by others as resource extraction and territorial expansion.
The academic consensus, such as it exists, holds Rwanda as a case study in the limits of post-atrocity governance. The country averaged 7.5% annual GDP growth between 2001 and 2019, cut poverty from 78% to 55%, and achieved 61% female parliamentary representation, while operating under a political system that some scholars (Scott Straus, Lee Ann Fujii, Susan Thomson) describe as "coerced reconciliation." The question is whether Rwanda's stability is durable or fragile: built on genuine social transformation, or on a regime's capacity to suppress the contradictions that produced the genocide in the first place.
Arguments
- Rwanda averaged 7.5% annual GDP growth under authoritarian governance
- Gacaca courts processed 1.96 million cases across 12,000 community tribunals between 2005 and 2012
- RPF atrocities during and after the genocide remain suppressed by the current government
- The genocide ideology law is used to silence legitimate political opposition
Sources
- The Gacaca Courts, Post-Genocide Justice and Reconciliation in Rwanda
- Political Governance in Post-Genocide Rwanda
- Whispering Truth to Power: Everyday Resistance to Reconciliation in Postgenocide Rwanda
The turn
What each account is not carrying.
The survivors' account is the one with the least power to shape policy, and the least incentive to be diplomatic about a government that also protects them.
From the record
Geopolitical context of the civil war since 1990RPF's own conduct during the advance on KigaliPost-genocide government's restrictions on ethnic identification and political speechUN Peacekeeping / International Failure
The peacekeepers' account is about a warning ignored, which is a story with a clear villain in New York, and it quietly steps around how little two thousand lightly armed monitors could have done once it started.
From the record
RPF atrocities during the advance on Kigali and in the aftermathThe agency of Rwandan perpetrators; the international failure narrative can obscure domestic responsibilityRegional dynamics including Uganda's long-standing support for the RPFThe limitations of what 2,500 peacekeepers could have achieved against a nationwide killing operationInternational Community / United Nations
The United Nations account is institutional, and institutions apologise in the passive voice. The international community failed is a sentence with no subject in it.
From the record
RPF atrocities during and after the genocideRegional dynamics including Uganda's support for the RPFRwandan diaspora politics and the civil war context since 1990The colonial account explains the categories and the card. It does not pick up a machete. Explaining where a weapon came from is not the same as saying who used it, and the people who organised this were adults making decisions.
From the record
Agency of Rwandan political actors in planning and executing the genocidePrecolonial Hutu-Tutsi relations and their complexitiesPost-genocide RPF governance and its authoritarian dimensionsPost-Genocide Rwanda / Academic
And the account of the Rwanda that followed leans on its own results, which is what every government that cannot be voted out eventually does.
From the record
The lived experience of genocide survivors in favor of systemic analysisThe immediate horror of the 100 daysEmotional and psychological dimensions of testimony and memory
Close
The killing stopped because the rebel army won, in July, and not because anybody intervened.
France's safe zone in the southwest, set up in the last weeks, also opened a road out. The organisers crossed it into what is now the Democratic Republic of Congo, rebuilt as armed groups, and the wars that followed there have killed several million more people.
The doctrine that states have a responsibility to protect populations from this was adopted by the United Nations in two thousand and five. It is invoked selectively.
A hundred days. Something near a million people. Five times the rate of the Nazi camps.
And of the fifty thousand who went to the school at Murambi because officials told them it was safe, thirty four were found alive the next morning, among the dead.
The record
By the numbers
- Span
- 100 daysApril 7 - mid-July 1994
- Killed
- 800K-1M
- Displaced
- 2Mrefugees fled the country; 3.5 million internally…
- Place
- Rwanda
Key figures
- Juvenal HabyarimanaPresident of Rwanda, assassinated April 6, 1994; his death triggered the genocide1937 to 1994
- Paul KagameCommander of the RPF, later President of Rwanda (2000-present)1957 to ?
- Romeo DallaireCanadian Force Commander of UNAMIR; requested reinforcements that were denied1946 to ?
- Kofi AnnanHead of UN Peacekeeping during the genocide; later acknowledged UN failure1938 to 2018
- Theoneste BagosoraColonel in the Rwandan army; convicted as primary organizer of the genocide1941 to 2021
- Jean KambandaPrime Minister during the genocide; pled guilty at the ICTR in 19981955 to ?
- Agathe UwilingiyimanaPrime Minister of Rwanda, assassinated by Interahamwe on April 7, 1994, the first political killing of the genocide1953 to 1994
Primary sources
· Code cable to Baril, DPKO, New York, "Request for protection for informant", paragraph 6, reporting what the informant said (National Security Archive, Briefing Book 452, document 3) · January 11, 1994
“HE HAS BEEN ORDERED TO REGISTER ALL TUTSI IN KIGALI. HE SUSPECTS IT IS FOR THEIR EXTERMINATION.”
· Code cable to Booh-Booh and Dallaire, "Contacts with Informant", sent over his name from the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (National Security Archive, Briefing Book 452, document 5) · January 11, 1994
“We cannot agree to the operation contemplated in paragraph 7 of your cable, as it clearly goes beyond the mandate entrusted to UNAMIR under resolution 872 (1993).”
· US Department of State Daily Press Briefing (the transcript spells her name Shelly) · June 10, 1994
“Based on the evidence we have seen from observations on the ground, we have every reason to believe that acts of genocide have occurred in Rwanda.”
· US Department of State Daily Press Briefing, in reply to the question "How many acts of genocide does it take to make genocide?" · June 10, 1994
“Alan, that's just not a question that I'm in a position to answer.”
· The phrase his plea agreement admits he uttered and that was repeatedly broadcast, as quoted in the ICTR Judgement and Sentence, paragraph 39 (x), the tribunal's English of the Kinyarwanda "Wima igihugu amaraso imbwa zikayanywera ubusa" · September 4, 1998
“you refuse to give your blood to your country and the dogs drink it for nothing.”
· Testimony before the ICTR, as recorded in the court's English in the Akayesu Judgement of 2 September 1998, paragraph 421 · September 2, 1998
“each time you encountered attackers they would rape you”
· Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Judgement, paragraph 731 · September 2, 1998
“Sexual violence was an integral part of the process of destruction, specifically targeting Tutsi women and specifically contributing to their destruction and to the destruction of the Tutsi group as a whole.”
· Address to the Parliament of Rwanda, Kigali, as issued in UN press release SG/SM/6552 (text checked against delivery) · May 7, 1998
“We will not deny that, in their greatest hour of need, the world failed the people of Rwanda.”
· Speech at the 20th commemoration, Amahoro National Stadium, Kigali, as the presidency's account quotes it · April 7, 2014
“The people who planned and carried out the Genocide were Rwandans, but the history and root causes go beyond this country.”
· La France, le Rwanda et le génocide des Tutsi (1990-1994), the report's own English text of its conclusion, page 986, answering "Is France an accomplice to the genocide of the Tutsi?" · March 26, 2021
“If by this we mean a willingness to join a genocidal operation, nothing in the archives that were examined demonstrates this.”
· Code cable to Baril, DPKO, New York, "Request for protection for informant", paragraph 5, reporting what the informant said, as the National Security Archive's text layer prints it · January 11, 1994
“INTERHAMWE HAS TRAINED 1700 MEN IN RGF MILITARY CAMPS OUTSIDE THE CAPITAL. THE 1700 ARE SCATTERED IN GROUPS OF 40 THROUGHOUT-KIGALI.”
· Prosecutor v. Bagosora, Kabiligi, Ntabakuze and Nsengiyumva, Judgement and Sentence, paragraph 14 · December 18, 2008
“Consequently, the Prosecution has not proven beyond reasonable doubt that the only reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence is that the four Accused conspired amongst themselves or with others to commit genocide before it unfolded from 7 April 1994. The Chamber has acquitted them of the count of conspiracy.”
· Prosecutor v. Kambanda, Judgement and Sentence, paragraph 39 (ii), the admissions of his plea agreement · September 4, 1998
“Jean Kambanda acknowledges that as Prime Minister of the Interim Government of Rwanda from 8 April 1994 to 17 July 1994, he was head of the 20 member Council of Ministers and exercised de jure authority and control over the members of his government.”
· Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Actions of the United Nations during the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda, the chronology, the entry for April 21 · 1999
“deciding to reduce the number of UNAMIR to 270 from 2,539 troops.”
· Contested Counting: Toward a Rigorous Estimate of the Death Toll in the Rwandan Genocide, the conclusion · 2020
“I have estimated between 491,000 and 522,000 Tutsi, nearly two thirds of Rwanda’s pre-genocide Tutsi population, were killed between 6 April and 19 July 1994.”
· Leave None to Tell the Story: Genocide in Rwanda, the report's section on the Rwandan Patriotic Front · 1999
“In defeating the interim government and its army, the RPF ended the genocide. At the same time, its troops committed grave violations of international humanitarian law by attacking and killing unarmed civilians.”
· Background Note: The Justice and Reconciliation Process in Rwanda, a United Nations report, the section on the Gacaca court system · 2014
“More than 12,000 community-based courts tried more than 1.2 million cases throughout the country.”
· Background Note: The Justice and Reconciliation Process in Rwanda, a United Nations report, the section on the Gacaca court system, its last sentence · 2014
“The Gacaca courts officially closed on 4 May 2012.”
· Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Judgement, the chamber's history of Rwanda, paragraph 83 · September 2, 1998
“In the early 1930s, Belgian authorities introduced a permanent distinction by dividing the population into three groups which they called ethnic groups, with the Hutu representing about 84% of the population, while the Tutsi (about 15%) and Twa (about 1%) accounted for the rest. In line with this division, it became mandatory for every Rwandan to carry an identity card mentioning his or her ethnicity.”
Threads
- The Congo WarsThe deadliest war since 1945 killed 5.4 million people. Most people cannot name the country where it happened.
- The Scramble for AfricaFourteen nations met in a Berlin conference room in 1884. Not one African was invited. By 1914, Europeans controlled 90% of the continent.
- The Congo Free StateLeopold II never visited the Congo. His agents collected severed hands as proof of productivity. The population fell by 10 million.